On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 5:21:14 AM EEST, Wookey wrote:
+++ Samuel Thibault [2015-05-06 01:09 +0200]:
Ansgar Burchardt, le Tue 05 May 2015 20:45:09 +0200, a écrit :
- info, texinfo, install-info:
I admit having used info only in desperation. Most documentation
comes in man page format.
-> demote to "optional"
Proper autoconf, automake, gcc, etc. documentations only really come in
info format.
Indeed.
If we are going to have an info reader installed can it please be
pinfo instead of info? It's _so_ much better.
I don't think that is a convincing reason to install info/pinfo as part of
standard. I read gcc docs always online with a web browser, yet I don't
insist chromium/firefox or even lynx being standard priority.
Checking the popcon[1] https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=texinfo
We see that info is ranked 115 on installed list, yet it is also ranked at
position 15 in "old" list (installed but not being used).
Riku,
brb, apt-get removing info and texinfo ffrom my systems...
[1] insert here the usual disclaimer that popcon is not to be taken as
authorative source of anything, just to provide general idea
Riku
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1e65606b-0cc7-46fa-9889-b70f60521...@iki.fi
