On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:42:00 +0200 Vincent Bernat <ber...@debian.org> wrote: > ❦ 14 avril 2015 18:22 +1000, Riley Baird > <bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch> : > > > It makes sense that for small changes, the preferred form for > > modification would be the generated bootstrap.css. A potential problem > > with this would be that you can generate bootstrap.css from the LESS > > files, but (I assume) you can't generate the LESS files from the > > bootstrap.css. > > > > Perhaps more importantly, CSS is easily understandable, whereas > > minified javascript is not. Debugging minified javascript is almost > > impossible. > > JS doesn't have to minified. Like the example above, the code can be > concatenated and edited. jQuery non-minified is distributed as a single > JS file while the original source is composed of many files.
Concatenated javascript sounds much more reasonable. I think that you could call this source code.
pgpp9LQcVJWe4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
