On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Daniel Pocock wrote: > That is not a Git-specific issue, it is a general issue with source-only > uploads. If source-only uploads become the norm then signed tags should > be the same as source packages shouldn't they?
Absolutely not! (Hint: .orig.tar.gz, often several. And other things. I don’t want to go into this in detail.) Besides: dput is not the tool to push source-only uploads into. dput is *also* used by people creating binary packages (and, quite possibly, builders, although Debian buildd network uses dupload) to publish them by their *.changes file into the target repository. dput is *also* used with a stanza like this… [i] method = local incoming = /var/cache/pbuilder/result/incoming allowed_distributions = .* … to copy the result of cowbuilder to a staging directory, or something else like that. T̲h̲a̲t̲’s my point here. Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> How would people feel if dput was a wrapper around git? > >dpkg --purge dput Nah, reportbug with severity critical, and if that doesn’t help, a local copy of the working dput with an epoch, to override the one from Debian. bye, //mirabilos -- [16:04:33] bkix: "veni vidi violini" [16:04:45] bkix: "ich kam, sah und vergeigte"... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.11.1411181519360.12...@tglase.lan.tarent.de
