On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:35:45AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 14, Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> wrote: > > > This is just a proof that storing the patches as real commits is useful. > > And that's the point of the patch-queue tag. Instead of having the patches > > only as real commits in the local repository, they get pushed to the > > public repository too under that tag (instead of appearing only within > > debian/patches/).
> In principle I agree, but in practice this must support perfect > roundtrips preserving all comments and metadata in the patches and gbp > is still a long way from supporting this. gbp-pq currently is not meant for a perfect round trip but rather for: import once and use what "git-format-patch" puts out from there on. I agree that this doesn't help much with e.g. NMUs so we should probably improve on that part. Cheers, -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141118080655.gc7...@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org
