On Thursday, November 13, 2014 01:32:04 Sam Hartman wrote: > Hi. > I've read the original proposal and believe it is generally going in the > right direction. > > things I liked: > > * didn't pick between dgit/git-dpm/git-pq; documented the common parts > > * Seemed to really focus on one clear scope. > > * Discouraged overlay packaging. > I've tried to read the arguments, and I'm unconvinced that should be a > recommended practice. > I'd prefer to simply rule it out of scope: this proposal describes how > to package debian and upstream sources together. It does not apply to > other cases and does not forbid or recommend them. > It doesn't apply to svn. It doesn't apply to overlay packaging.
If the scope is narrower than Debian as a whole, then the title of the DEP needs to change. Maybe: Recommended layout for Git packaging repositories which also contain upstream sources Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2509218.QQGvL7qbEk@scott-latitude-e6320
