On 20/10/2014 13:50, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > sofia-sip 1.12.11+20110422.1-2 Failed [UNKNOWN] /bin/sh: 4: pushd: not > found >> bashism, you should reportbug that, RC severity (Policy 10.4) > hdf-eos4 2.19v1.00+dfsg.1-1 Failed [UNKNOWN] ../libtool: 1: eval: > base_compile+= -c: not found > libvisca 1.0.1-1 Failed [UNKNOWN] ../libtool: 1: eval: base_compile+= -c: not > found > ntop 3:5.0.1+dfsg1-2 Failed [UNKNOWN] ./libtool: 1: eval: base_compile+= -c: > not found >> (incidentally, all those += as well) This looks like a false positive in testing. hdf-eos4 at least uses the system libtool (which has moved from libtool to libtool-bin, leading to a FTBFS I need to fix). The system libtool has an explicit #!/bin/bash
> To be completely fair, you should repeat the very same source package > builds, with the very same archive snapshot in use (actually, for > rebuilds like this, using snapshot.d.o as the *only* entry in > sources.list, for both deb and deb-src, is the way to go) as during > the initial rebuild against the new dash version, to diff failures. > (Or rebuild stock archive first, filter out failures, then rebuild > what built.) bye, //mirabilos -- Alastair McKinstry, <alast...@sceal.ie>, <mckins...@debian.org>, https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry Software is like Poetry - most of it shouldn't have been written. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54452570.8030...@sceal.ie
