Free software is about the sharing of that freedom So there is nothing wrong with urging people to reconsider if non-free is really what they want
(therefore my idea to add that to clause5) We shouldn't even be supporting non-free by hosting it, yet we do So it is a good idea to mention to people they should reconsider if there are other ways of getting a free alternative than putting non-free into the repository. If you support hosting of non-free you support putting people in jail. but debian users are nice people apparently, got a non-free repos :-) A one-liner mention that the person wanting their non-free uploaded should reconsider would be a good thing due to it not being optimal with a large non-free repos as I said. On Sat, 11 Oct 2014, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 03:46:27PM +0200, Michael Ole Olsen wrote: > > having a too large non-free repos is not a good thing IMO. > > Be that as it may, there's no reason why Debian as a whole should agree with > that. > > -- > It is easy to love a country that is famous for chocolate and beer > > -- Barack Obama, speaking in Brussels, Belgium, 2014-03-26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141012023346.ga10...@rlogin.dk
