On 26 September 2014 14:58, Neil Williams <codeh...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:19:24 +0100 > Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.j.led...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> Package: wnpp >> Owner: Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.j.led...@linux.intel.com> >> Severity: wishlist >> >> * Package name : obs-build >> Version : 20140918 >> Upstream Author : Adrian Schröter <adr...@suse.de> >> * URL or Web page : https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-build >> * License : GPL-2+ >> Description : scripts for building RPM/debian packages for >> multiple distributions >> >> This package provides scripts for building RPM and debian packages in >> contained environments for various build distributions. These tools >> are use by Open Build Service workers and openSUSE distribution by >> default. >> >> By default it claims very generic paths: >> /usr/bin/build >> /usr/lib/build >> >> I'm planning to keep those as per upstream, if however there are >> strong objections I'd be happy to change those to obs-build. > > Any number of packages could have claimed /usr/bin/build by now, > instead we have sbuild, debuild, pdebuild, make, dpkg-buildpackage, > git-buildpackage and a host of others. I don't see that obs deserves to > be the "one true build" which may be the impression given by an overly > common binary name. >
So i've patched obs-build to use obs-build and tested out osc with it. Which turned out hardcoded paths to /var/lib/build in some legacy support checks. Filed bug-report which has been fixed upstream. obs-build uploaded, and should hit new queue soon. Once it's in, I'll propose for osc to cherry-pick that upstream commit, set build-cmd to "obs-build" and depend/recommend/suggest obs-build package. Regards, Dimitri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANBHLUjPibkyVnEqB8cQH_wfYgt98=kumxz1a8eogsckcq_...@mail.gmail.com
