Hi David, 2014-09-30 13:35 GMT+02:00 David Weinehall <t...@debian.org>: > The latest upload of xbmc seems a bit botched; this is the > changelog in its entirety: > > > xbmc (2:13.2+dfsg1-2~exp0) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium > . > * > > Now, there is nothing wrong with terse and succinct changelogs, > but I'd say this is a bit *too* terse, and not at all succinct. :-) Thanks for pointing this out. I'll upload a fixed version soon. Luckily the content of the package content was OK, I just forgot about the last update to the changelog.
> > Also, should the builders even accept packages that has an invalid > distribution specified (in the most recent changelog entry, that is)? I think rejecting those during upload would be a good idea. Cheers, Balint > > Filtering out "UNRELEASED" and packages with an empty changelog would > prevent at least some premature uploads. > > > Kind regards, David Weinehall > -- > /) David Weinehall <t...@debian.org> /) Rime on my window (\ > // ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // Diamond-white roses of fire // > \) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Beautiful hoar-frost (/ > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAK0OdpzHzU3vAhHjoXLS-qiz0-SfMwcwMFi5O8HJJxaBgBNE=w...@mail.gmail.com
