> On 27 Sep 2014, at 10:36, Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote: > > Except that the endianness war has been won by little-endian And yet, network byte order remains big. It's less important which endian they pick, but that they pick one and use it consistently across arches. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/c44c80e0-6812-43e1-a584-3c0da7891...@debian.org
- binary data file and endianness and multiarch Jerome BENOIT
- Re: binary data file and endianness and multiarch Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: binary data file and endianness and multia... Adam Borowski
- Re: binary data file and endianness and mu... Jonathan Dowland
- Re: binary data file and endianness an... Matthias Urlichs
- Re: binary data file and endianness an... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: binary data file and endianness and mu... Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: binary data file and endianness an... Jerome BENOIT
- Re: binary data file and endianne... Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: binary data file and endianness and mu... Thomas Goirand
- Re: binary data file and endianness an... Johannes Schauer
- Re: binary data file and endianness an... Adam D. Barratt
- Re: binary data file and endianness an... Guillem Jover