Brian May <br...@microcomaustralia.com.au> wrote:
On 26 September 2014 09:32, Matthias Urlichs
<matth...@urlichs.de> wrote:
True, the usecases overlap somewhat, but they're still
different.
I wouldn't want to install n-m (and the 30 libraries it
depends on)
in an initramfs, for instance.
Unless I am mistaken, I believe systemd-networkd would be a lot
better suited the n-m on servers. Configuration is stored in
plain text files, can be recorded in etckeeper/git, etc.
As Vincent explained, NM works in a similar way.
The problem on servers is that you need advanced features such as
bridging, VLANs, bonding… and NM already does all of that.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'
`-
