On 13 September 2014 02:58, John Goerzen <jgoer...@complete.org> wrote:
> is ecryptfs. (LUKS and dm_crypt solve different problems.) Compared to > Do you trust ecryptfs? https://defuse.ca/audits/ecryptfs.htm says "eCryptfs appears to have a better crypto design than EncFS [4], but there are some red flags indicating that it was not designed by a cryptographer, and has not received enough security review. It should be safe to use, but more auditing would be a good idea." I can't see any security audit for dm_crypt. I see google results that suggest LUKS has been audited, but not the report. -- Brian May <br...@microcomaustralia.com.au>
