On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 05:29:41PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:43:01PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > No, they should add amd64 as a foreign architecture. > > Should we do this by default for x32 in d-i? (Yes, I know d-i doesn't > support x32 in other ways yet, but we might as well get started at some > point.)
x32 has the following major use cases: * vserver hosting * underpowered netbooks * get-any-last-percent-of-speed number crunching At least the first two prefer a small installed size, which means a pure system without two sets of binaries. -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory prices. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140905181427.gb25...@angband.pl
