Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> writes: > Am 28.08.2014 13:52, schrieb Chris Boot:
>> You may find it easier to bundle the logcheck rules with systemd itself >> rather than as part of logcheck-database. Debhelper has a >> dh_installlogcheck tool that you may find useful. In my opinion, >> packaging the logcheck rules with the program that generates the log >> messages makes more sense, as the rules can be more easily kept up to >> date with the generating program. +1. Usually this makes more sense. > I'm not sure if anyone in the systemd team is actively using logcheck, I > don't. So from my pov I'd prefer if it was maintained by someone who > actually does. I use logcheck, and I'm happy to submit wishlist bugs when things change that I notice. That still requires that you all apply new filter rules, but hopefully that shouldn't be too much work. > And do we really want to install those logcheck rules files (conffiles) > on everyones system, if only a small percentage of users actually > install logcheck. Lots of other packages already do, and the logcheck maintainers had been pushing that as best practices. The files aren't particularly large. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87iolcismu....@hope.eyrie.org
