On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:43:27AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > That turns smaller adjustments in applications into > > developing entirely different interfaces for each application, while > > GnuTLS itself still lacks a lot of features. > > Do you have any reference for this? I have not followed this closely > but historically GnuTLS seemed to do very well feature wise (e.g. > early TLS 1.2 support).
I was referring to the paper from utexas, linked to in a different post, but mistakenly counted the errors listed there (7 out of 16) as missing features. Kind regards, --Toni++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
