On 07/08/2014 02:19 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:16:37PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Unless I'm mistaking, there's no sign that the PHP license prevents >> derivative work (even under a different license for your patch, if you >> feel like it). > > It's my reading that this is the case if you rename your project to not > contain PHP (if it does), which would otherwise be violation of the license. > > / > | 4. Products derived from this software may not be called "PHP", nor > | may "PHP" appear in their name, without prior written permission > | from gr...@php.net. You may indicate that your software works in > | conjunction with PHP by saying "Foo for PHP" instead of calling > | it "PHP Foo" or "phpfoo" > \
Yes. The only restriction is to not use php-* for derivative packages. That's very close to what we have with Firefox^WIceweasel. Maybe we shouldn't have named all of our PEAR package php-*, but pear-* at least, to avoid the issue. Though I'm not going to be the one working on all the renaming ... :/ Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53bbfb43.5040...@debian.org
