Andreas Tille writes ("Re: FDL with no invariant sections"):
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:35:55PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > [Andreas:]
> > > ... reintroducing a small piece of documentation which
> > > is heavily outdated (covering version 2.5 - we are now at 6.6) ...
> >
> > Do you consider the lack of the DFSG-free manual an RC bug ?
>
> Given that we agreed that it is simply a false positive by lintian
> neither the current version in testing (including the doc) nor the
> current version in unstable (without the outdated / irrelevant doc) are
> RC buggy. What I wrote above is that I just do not see any reason to
> stress test our infrastructure to re-add something which is not relevant
> anyway and will be replaced by a new version relatively (compared to the
> freeze) soon.
Right. Apparently I didn't read your mail properly because I didn't
spot that sentence about the age of the manual. Sorry.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/21371.16985.514638.515...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
