Matthias Urlichs dixit: >Thorsten Glaser: >> Did you *read* how upstream answered the one thing I *did* forward >> myself? >> >For the benefit of the other readers here, would you please supply a >reference URL?
Sure: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728053 >> <igli> exceptions: a truly awful implementation of quite a nice idea. >> <igli> just about the worst way you could do something like that, afaic. >> <igli> it's like anti-design. <mirabilos> that toob> <igli> sure, tho i >> doubt anyone will listen ;) > >I agree that they're somewhat like democracy -- pretty bad, >but all other possible solutions are worse. No, explicit C error handling, once you standardise on one way of signalling errors (ideally, 0 = okay, !0 = error), bears the other methods. But let’s not become even more off-topic ☻ bye, //mirabilos -- “It is inappropriate to require that a time represented as seconds since the Epoch precisely represent the number of seconds between the referenced time and the Epoch.” -- IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993 (POSIX) Section B.2.2.2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1405041017460.18...@herc.mirbsd.org
