On 2014-04-30 16:39 +0200, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 04:22:37PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: >> I think we should first understand why the detection is failing with >> the newer make. I'm taking a look now. Once that's done we might just >> be able to fix (or workaround) one of: >> >> * make >> * dpkg-buildpackage >> * affected packages >> >> If none of the above can be fixed then I'm all for just removing the >> detection code, although that might be painful, AFAIR the numbers were >> a bit scary last time Roger posted them? > > Back in February, it was around 14% remaining. When we originally added > the hack, it was a bit under 50% supported. Primarily dh and cdbs usage. > A lot of the gains are due to dh adoption since then. It's fair to say > making the change will break a large number of packages.
Only 2400+ of them: http://lintian.debian.org/tags/debian-rules-missing-recommended-target.html Cheers, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/874n1a3kra....@turtle.gmx.de
