On Thu, 27 Mar 2014, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Mathieu Malaterre <ma...@debian.org>, 2014-03-27, 13:06: > >I preferred not to mass bug everyone out there and instead: > > > >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742780 > > But many packages don't regenerate autofoo at build-time. :-( > > >LFS is still a release goal, not a requirement. > > Then "severity: grave" is probably overkill. :-P
No, it is not. I can cause data loss or corruption when operating with large files, and it is aggravated by the fact that the application used to work in LFS mode just fine on Wheezy, but it is now broken. LFS has been a release goal for a LONG time, which means we have fixed a LOT of packages to have LFS for at least two stable releases already and therefore regressions on LFS support *are* an issue. Also, autotooling at build time (i.e. regenerating the autofoo) is our recommended best practice, exactly so that we can actually have a shot at fixing this kind of crap... IMO, this is very much a "grave" bug. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140408143923.gd1...@khazad-dum.debian.net
