On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 10:47 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Xavier Roche wrote: > > > I have a rather silly question: would a mail (signed with this key) > > request to the DDs who already signed the initial key (and checked the > > identity) to sign the replacement key considered unreasonable ? > > Considering that the initial keys are now considered weak, I expect > that it would be reasonable for people to not trust a key transition > statement where the only available trust anchor is the old weak key.
That is however no reason not to do it - you're still better off than you were before (equally weak, but with the potential to improve). Cheers, Nick -- Nick Phillips / nick.phill...@otago.ac.nz / 03 479 4195 # These statements are mine, not those of the University of Otago
