On 02/26/2014 14:39, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > I was going to send a mail about this yesterday. I've decided I'm going > to start a quest to support this. I settled on Build-Indep-Architecture > myself.
"Build-Architecture-Indep" might also work and is visually similar to the already existing "Build-Depends-Indep" and "Build-Conflicts-Indep" fields. > BTW; the syntax would define a single arch; you know, in the spirit of > reproducability. I think allowing multiple architectures is more technically correct: not restricting the build to specific architectures implies "any" so we allow muliple architectures already. For the implementation we might want to have a priority list. The first architecture from the priority list that is allowed in Build-Arch-Indep (or whatever) would build the arch:all packages. The list would likely start with amd64 or i386 so that arch:all packages without Build-Arch-Indep would be built on amd64 (i386). Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/530e080f.8080...@debian.org