On 02/14/2014 07:59 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > That IS twisting things in true pro systemd style.
That's not twisting, he is just asking for something proof such claims, nothing more. > It would seem wrong (again this is > before I've found time in looking at the details of the members > reasoning) to outright consider 4 for systemd against 4 for the others > as a decision in favour of systemd? The TC acted in compliance with the Policy, so there is nothing wrong with the result. I don't understand why you are questioning it. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52fe6fb3.6050...@physik.fu-berlin.de
