Sune Vuorela <nos...@vuorela.dk> writes: > On 2013-11-16, Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> wrote:
>> If someone proposed to remove nvi from the archive because vim is >> better, I would be quite annoyed. If it ever did get removed from the >> archive, I would probably adopt it and reintroduce it, because nvi is >> the editor that I'm used to for small files and for root editing tasks, >> I want to keep using it, and none of the things that are wrong with it >> are fatal for that usage. > Note that nvi is orphaned, no removal could happen given that many > people thinks vim is better. Yeah, I know, which is part of why I used it for an example. I looked at it yesterday and will probably adopt it at some point when I have enough free time to do a proper job on the initial upload. We're carrying around a ton of patches, and upstream seems to still exist although they've been quite dormant, so some investigation will be required. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zjp2bzp8....@windlord.stanford.edu
