nss-mdns/unstable is currently available in these flavours: libnss-mdns:any (contains a native binary) lib32nss-mdns:amd64 (contains an i386 binary)
My goal is that when amd64 users with both packages do a dist-upgrade to jessie, if they have the i386 foreign architecture, they receive libnss-mdns:amd64 and libnss-mdns:i386, plus whatever transitional packages are needed to make that transition work. I expect that "most" lib32nss-mdns users installed it for Wine's benefit (having libnss-mdns but not lib32nss-mdns used to break DNS for 32-bit things, which appears to be a long-since-fixed glibc bug), so they'll have the i386 foreign architecture already. In nss-mdns/experimental, I tried this: Package: libnss-mdns Architecture: any Multi-Arch: same Package: lib32nss-mdns Architecture: i386 Depends: libnss-mdns (= ${binary:Version}) Description: ... transitional package ... hoping that apt would automatically cross-grade lib32nss-mdns:amd64 to lib32nss-mdns:i386, pulling in libnss-mdns:i386 as a dependency. However, when I installed those packages in a local apt repository and upgraded a VM that tracks that repository, it turns out that doesn't actually work. If cross-architecture dependencies are allowed in the archive (and don't break dak or britney) these days, then it's easy: Package: libnss-mdns Architecture: any Multi-Arch: same Package: lib32nss-mdns Architecture: amd64 Depends: libnss-mdns:i386 (= ${binary:Version}) Description: ... transitional package ... I thought I remembered an announcement that cross-arch dependencies were OK for jessie, but I couldn't find it, so that might just be wishful thinking? The only other option I can think of is to imitate Wine: Package: libnss-mdns Architecture: any Multi-Arch: same Package: lib32nss-mdns Architecture: amd64 Depends: libnss-mdns-i386 (= ${binary:Version}) Description: ... transitional package ... Package: libnss-mdns-i386 Architecture: i386 Depends: libnss-mdns (= ${binary:Version}) Description: ... transitional package ... but that requires yet another content-free package, and a trip through the NEW queue. So, before I upload that: is there a better way? Thanks, S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5273ac9b.9090...@debian.org