On 31/10/13 15:01, Ian Jackson wrote: > This seems to have come along very well in the past few days.
Yes. Things are very heated, but a lot of things have been researched and documented along the way. I've been learning a lot about init systems I wasn't familiar with and some differences in opinion (maintainers vs. administrators vs. casual users) I never even imagined. During the course of this even my own preferences have changed several times. > We now have five camps with pages with substantial content: This does not translate neatly into five possible courses of action though. Opting for 'multiple' init systems would still leave various combinations to decide upon. There is uncertainty about ideas brought up for future work that may not exist yet, such as a 'neutral meta-language definition' or perhaps extending an init system with features or syntax from another. > Perhaps it would be good if the camp leader(s) for each camp would > reply with a summary of: I could use help with the sysvinit page. I was hoping someone might step up as camp leader for it, someone who is fully behind it. All I've done is mention points raised in debian-devel and elsewhere. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52727a3b.6090...@pyro.eu.org
