> > > > IANA ftp-master, but here's my quick review: > > > > Please rename /sbin/rc to something else. We've had (unrelated) > > /usr/bin/rc in Debian for at least 18 years. > > Outch! This bites hard. Maybe you being the maintainer of the "rc" > package is why you saw this immediately! :) > > Though that's annoying, because upstream must extensively uses "rc". All > OpenRC commands are in fact using /sbin/rc. For example, /bin/rc-status > (which shows what is a symlink to /bin/rc, and then /sbin/rc finds out > that it has been called by using /bin/rc-status, so it prints the status. > > I'm not sure how hard it will be to fix, though I don't expect it's > going to be just-a-simple-rename... :(
Could this problem be explained. As long as they are in separate directories and called explicitly does that matter? Is it because on BSD, binaries in /sbin would be found if just rc rather than /usr/bin/rc was used? -- _______________________________________________________________________ 'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a universal interface' (Doug McIlroy) In Other Words - Don't design like polkit or systemd _______________________________________________________________________ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/350320.75803...@smtp102.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
