Let the war begin... ;) On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 14:29 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Pros: > - stable support for advanced boot/SAN environments How far is this: https://wiki.debian.org/AdvancedStartupShutdownWithMultilayeredBlockDevices really supported now?
> - things like gnome become easier to package An other things become more difficult or even impossible to package (what about the BSD flavours, Hurd, etc. pp.) > Cons: > - some work to do (how much depends on the choice and on the details. > but keeping sysvinit on life support is not free either) - I know that at least dm-crypt support does not work for all relevant/reasonable usages of dmcrypt (i.e. key-scripts) yet. - It's far more complex than traditional sysvinit, which can also mean problems in the end. > Since the init system strongly shapes many other packages, there has to > be only one and no other supported options. Well... has there? I think it's good to have one that MUST be supported, but why not more? In principle I tend towards systemd, which seems more powerful and likely to be supported by more people in the end. upstart is rather a Canonical thingy and it seems rather unclear where Canonical is really heading towards (just look at developments like Mir). Cheers, Chris. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1382706410.21620.13.ca...@heisenberg.scientia.net
