On 24/10/13 03:00, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:21:25AM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote: >> 2013/10/24 Steve Langasek <[email protected]>: >> > Well, that's one more reason the init system and the dbus services should >> > be >> > separated out in the packaging. >> Some of the services consume functions and features provided by >> systemd (the init system). > > Which is exactly the kind of embrace-and-extend that Debian should not > tolerate having foisted on them in the default desktop by an upstream > pushing an agenda.
How often is the choice of default desktop re-evaluated, and how is this done? Roger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
