sorry for huge mistake bugs report. My program met some problem. I am shutdowning the wrong bugs.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote: > Let's discuss this on debian-devel. Here is what I answered to bug > 723358 about hwloc. > > Samuel Thibault, le Tue 17 Sep 2013 13:01:32 +0200, a écrit : >> YunQiang Su, le Tue 17 Sep 2013 18:38:26 +0800, a écrit : >> > This package has one or more -L/usr/lib in its build system, >> >> Err, no, it doesn't. Please recheck your build log carefully. And >> don't do Mass Bug Filling without extra care, which includes discussing >> about it on debian-devel first! >> >> > which will make it ftbfs if there is libraries under /usr/lib, >> > while is not the default architecture, mips* for example. >> > >> > On mips* systems, /usr/lib is defined as place to hold O32 >> > libraries, and /usr/lib32 for N32, and /usr/lib64 is for N64. >> >> That's not necessarily a problem: a spurious -L/usr/lib does not hurt, >> the linker will simply not take the binaries. It's only if -L/usr/lib >> is required for proper linking that it would be a problem. But the >> compiler already has that in its search path, so there is really no >> problem. >> >> > Beside the way, on the multiarch system like Debian, user may install >> > libraries under /usr/lib by hand. >> >> No, they are not supposed to be doing that. >> >> > The attachement is the buildlog of this package on mips64el platform. >> >> The build didn't even start... > > Samuel -- YunQiang Su -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cakcpw6xvyjuh5qb6wfggum1h6ft-eqmbebjhqflf-upoyqw...@mail.gmail.com
