On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 03:08:12PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > >But maybe a more polite way would be to ask something like `adt > >--is-running` and let adt implement it as it likes. > > There's a hidden assumption here that adt is the only thing that > will ever run the tests.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but given http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep8/ any implementation of DEP8 should define ADTTMP, sadt included. The variable name may be badly chosen, since it is named after a particular test runner. But this seems to be another issue, right? Cheers -- Enrico Tassi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130916144224.GA23680@birba.invalid
