Thanks for pointing this out, I have missed it on first read. In that case I still don't see a strong reason why to have a public apt-getable i.d.o.
Ondřej Surý > On 29. 8. 2013, at 18:06, James McCoy <james...@debian.org> wrote: > > > On Aug 29, 2013 10:30 AM, "Ondřej Surý" <ond...@sury.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org> wrote: > >> > >> The open question is if having earlier (easy) access to uploads is > >> worthwhile or > > > > > > That would only make sense if buildds would be given access to i.d.o, and I > > consider this to be very dangerous (so I am not proposing this, juste > > mentioning it). > > As Ansgar described in another part of his email, the buildds already have > access to incoming.