Thanks for pointing this out, I have missed it on first read.

In that case I still don't see a strong reason why to have a public apt-getable 
i.d.o.

Ondřej Surý

> On 29. 8. 2013, at 18:06, James McCoy <james...@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Aug 29, 2013 10:30 AM, "Ondřej Surý" <ond...@sury.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> The open question is if having earlier (easy) access to uploads is
> >> worthwhile or
> >
> >
> > That would only make sense if buildds would be given access to i.d.o, and I 
> > consider this to be very dangerous (so I am not proposing this, juste 
> > mentioning it).
> 
> As Ansgar described in another part of his email, the buildds already have 
> access to incoming.

Reply via email to