On 2013-07-31 21:01:21 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 07/31/2013 06:47 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > But this wouldn't necessarily solve the mentioned "problem" > > anyway. > > I'm not sure there's a problem anyway. I'm on the side of Steve, which > is I think the current setup works quite well.
I agree. That's why I've put quotes. > Our users can do a minimum of configuration, that's what I expect > from anyone running a server/daemon anyway (things who are aimed at > our users should be using localhost anyway). Or better, report a bug against the broken software. Otherwise different servers could require conflicting configurations! -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130801225405.ga12...@xvii.vinc17.org
