Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:47:45PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: >> Package: python-debian >> Version: 0.1.21+nmu2 >> Severity: wishlist >> Control: block -1 by 704594 > >> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:19:42PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> > Can you please file a bug report about that (ideally marking the pending >> > ITPs as blockers for it)? Regarding changing interfaces it would be >> > better not to do that, of course, but even more so because it's not >> > clear to me how many users of the debfile module are out there in the >> > wild. We can do a call for it or something, but let's move the >> > discussion to an appropriate bug report first. > >> Sure. Here is your bug. So let me give a summary of advantages of the >> move: >> * Less code. >> * Works with non-seekable fileobjs. >> * #642020 is fixed for free (but there also is a patch). >> * #689313 would be obsoleted (but there also is a patch). >> * python-arpy has a responsive upstream and maintainer. > > The python-arpy package in the NEW queue doesn't have a python3 version, so > this would regress python-debian. You might want to fix this first.
Support is there upstream. I just need to figure out how to build the python3 variant Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87iozpxe9y....@mitoraj.siccegge.de
