On 05/15/2013 02:16 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 15.05.2013 01:26, schrieb brian m. carlson:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 10:08:21PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
This is utter bullshit and you should already know it. Systemd is much
more reliable as a whole than any other implementation. I have yet to
see a use case where it is not better.
It is not better if you don't want proprietary binary-format logs in
The format may be binary, but it certainly is not proprietary [1]
I really can't believe people are still coming up with that non-sense.
I have no idea why people assume that a binary format means it can only
be processed with a special, proprietary tool. Binary simply means what
it means, binary and not text which means it's a more stream-lined and
machine-readable format as opposed to a text format with no formatting
at all.
And, when it comes to processing, binary data is actually *easier* to
process. Everyone who has ever written a text parser themselves will
agree.
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5192d6f4.6090...@physik.fu-berlin.de
