On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Debian backports offers me *one* repository. I need 3 of them:
I don't see why. The combination of suites we have now should be enough. Here is what I would do... > - stable -1 (currently OpenStack Folsom) Ignore, is there any reason why an old version is interesting? > - stable (currently OpenStack Grizzly) sid+jessie+wheezy-backports+squeeze-backports-sloppy > - development (currently OpenStack Havana) experimental > Also, the rules in backports is that packages should be already migrated > to testing. The point is, if I had PPAs, I wouldn't at all upload to SID > and wait > for a migration to testing, because it would be better if the packages were > living in the PPA only (that would be a lot more flexible and adapted to my > use case). I think that would be a bit sad and I hope you don't do that. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6HxZkrxzue9FmVoWgfZ-m7nB+Rt-MxCt5F=u=ab7rt...@mail.gmail.com
