Riku Voipio wrote: >On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:19:59PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > >> 3) do not implement the full libjpeg8 ABI, nor the upcoming libjpeg9. > >This would be a relevant if some application actually used the >"full libjpeg8 ABI" . In fact, 100% of debian works fine with >libjpeg-turbo, or even the original libjpeg6b (if the would be >recompiled against it again). > >I find the reason that IJG libjpeg8 fork is so triggerhappy to >repeatedly break the API and ABI (and image format!) rather a reason >to make libjpeg8 the non-default.
That *alone* sounds like a good argument for switching, to be honest... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
