Johannes Schauer, le Tue 05 Mar 2013 14:41:51 +0100, a écrit : > Quoting Samuel Thibault (2013-03-05 13:41:12) > > Maybe arch:all-only source packages should be shown in a different color: > > AIUI these do not pose a problem for bootstrapping a new Debian port, since > > one does not need to build the source package, and just pick up the existing > > _all.deb. They still pose a problem for bootstrapping debian from scratch, > > of > > course. > > Can you give an example of a source package which you think is wrongly > included > in the list?
For instance commons-beanutils is only producing arch:all packages (I don't understand why it has separate Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep BTW), so AIUI, ports don't need to build it and thus do not have to care about the dependency loop. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130305135704.gs6...@type.bordeaux.inria.fr
