Hi Bernhard, "Bernhard R. Link" <brl...@debian.org> writes: >> >> (and of course just “codesearch” for the binaries). >> > >> > I assume s/binaries/sources/? And I'd suggest to just not policy the >> No, I really meant binaries, as in “cgrep”, “cindex” and “csearch” in >> this specific case. > > And what is the name of the binary package those programs will be in? “codesearch”, as I wrote.
>> > Another question: Have you considered asking for a archive Section for >> > those packages? I guess with no special section yet all those packages >> > would be section libdevel as they are for static linking only, wouldn't >> > they? >> As pabs has pointed out, I did that, but the general rule of thumb is >> that we want to have lots of packages first and an archive section >> second. > Too avoid packaging mistakes and to have the wording ready I'd suggest > to already prepare the wording (I guess in the section later will be > everything that is is now in libdevel plus golong toolchain packages, > while everything providing programs to be in their respective section). Which wording do you mean? -- Best regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/x61ue4ne3d....@midna.zekjur.net
