On Fri, 09 Nov 2012, Josselin Mouette wrote: > It looks to me that we should strictly favor the transitional package > approach instead. Shouldn’t we entirely forbid the > Provides/Conflicts/Replaces combination way of handling upgrades, except > for virtual packages?
And instantly break even further the upgrade path of lots of already-published packages? This is the sort of thing that might need a deployment plan over two stable releases, it is probably better to find a way to fix apt. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121109124628.ga8...@khazad-dum.debian.net
