Roger Leigh <rle...@codelibre.net> writes: > On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 01:08:18PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: >> Roger Leigh <rle...@codelibre.net> writes: >> >> > On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 12:55:09PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: >> >> >> >> * Package name : double-conversion >> > >> > libjs-double-conversion would be more appropriate, since >> > this is a javascript library. double-conversion is too >> > generic. >> >> It's actually written in C++, not JS, so I don't think the libjs prefix >> is appropriate. >> >> The name "double-conversion" is taken from upstream, but I agree that it >> is quite generic. I don't have any better idea, but suggestions are >> welcome. > > Sorry, misread the description there. In that case, libdoubleconversion > would be better for the binary packages (though the source package name > doesn't need changing).
Sure. I plan to use libdouble-conversion{,-dev,-dbg} (I prefer to keep
the hyphen in the binary package name, unless this is bad practice).
--
.''`. Sébastien Villemot
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
`- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
pgpgfkYQk1qMU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
