On 11/03/2012 06:24 AM, martin f krafft wrote: > Hey folks, > > wheezy will be the first Debian release to feature dependency-based > booting (insserv). I just finished installing a very simple gateway > (IPv4 and IPv6) for a customer, and unbound is failing to start > during a regular boot. > > The reason is that by the time bind() is called, the IPv6 address > (configured with /e/n/i inet6 static, which unbound should listen > on) is not yet ready, but "tentative", so the bind() call fails. > > In squeeze, this wasn't usually a problem because enough happened > before S20unbound got called. > > In wheezy, however, S03unbound gets called in parallel as soon as > "$network $remote_fs $syslog" are provided, and > /etc/rcS.d/S10networking turns on $network right after configuring > the IPv6 address, ignoring that IPv6 assignment comes with the > "tentative" period, during which duplicate address detection (DAD) > is being performed. > > I can now disable DAD, or insert "sleep 10" at the top of > /etc/init.d/unbound, but neither is an acceptable solution. > > IPv6 has been a release goal for years and we are about to release > another Debian version that does not properly cater for IPv6. > > What can be done? > Hi,
Are the hooks in /etc/network/if-{down,post-down,up,pre-up} only for ipv4? If so, shouldn't it be extended to also support v6, and unbound (patched to) use it? I can see that bind9 has: "rndc reconfig >/dev/null 2>&1 || true" in these folders. Wouldn't something similar work with unbound? Cheers, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/509542e8.7060...@debian.org