Lucas Nussbaum writes ("[PROPOSAL v2] Orphaning another maintainer's packages"): > - one week has passed since the ITO bug was submitted, and at least > 3 DDs supported the orphaning (possibly including the submitter > of the ITO bug, if it was a DD), while nobody objected.
I think one week is far too short. I think Zack's proposed 15 days is still far too short. As so many people have sid, none of this is urgent. I think four weeks would be much better. A maintainer might reasonably go abroad for 2-3 weeks - we even have a VAC process for handling absences. (And we don't want to complicate this third-party orphan process with references to VACs.) Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20623.53877.252062.170...@chiark.greenend.org.uk