On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 06:24:24PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > So in sum, I'm broadly in favor of Lucas's patch, except: > > - A single nack is evidence of a lack of consensus. If consensus can't be > achieved, it should be referred to the TC instead of making a political > mess of things for the rest of the project.
I fully agree with that. > - There does need to be a mandatory minimum waiting period. This process > is going to be seen as "blessed" via the devref; we should not be > blessing a process with an obvious bug that permits abuse by a DD and > three of her friends pulling off a hostile takeover of a package before > anybody has a chance to say no. Even though such an act *can* be > appealed to the TC, we shouldn't put ourselves in the situation that it > has to be. I won't object to adding a mandatory minimum waiting period, although in some obvious cases it will lead to a pointless delay. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121027041826.ga5...@master.debian.org
