Guillem Jover dixit: >then some of the cases this tries to address (the “optional” nature of >dependencies for derivatives for example) would get covered by my >build-profiles proposal in #661538, which as stated there might need
Yes, please! Besides bootstrapping, use cases do include derived distributions, such as no SELinux in Univention 2.x (FSVO x which are not current) which jupp depended on as it can make use of it, or mksh losing dietlibc-dev in *buntu since move from universe to main, thus requiring a one-line change for every upload… bye, //mirabilos -- FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much *much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I hadn't wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank Terbeck in #!/bin/mksh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1209101228240.29...@herc.mirbsd.org
