Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezme...@gmail.com> writes: > If you go for changing the name, kerberos-wallet or krb-wallet seems quite > right.
It's a reasonable idea for the current implementation, but I'd rather not use that either because the protocol was designed to not require Kerberos. It currently is only implemented using a remctl protocol, but you could easily use REST or SOAP to communicate with the backend and 90% of the software would work without modification. (In fact, in the long run, I hope to do that sort of implementation, or one that uses ssh public keys for authentication.) -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87mx11cpfh....@windlord.stanford.edu
