On Fri, Jan 09, 1998 at 01:07:29PM +0000, Enrique Zanardi wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jan 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 08, 1998 at 11:26:53AM -0601, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > > > The sources are compiled with a newt version that is NOT 0.10; there are > > > tons of functions not present in 0.10, I don't know if their's newer, > > > older or plain different. > > > > They have newt and newt-devel 0.21 in their binary RPMs directory. > > We have both in master's Incoming.
Great. I had a hell of a time with their shared libraries. I installed their libraries and include files from the RPMs in /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/include, then compiled sndconfig. Afterwards when I tried to run it, it wanted libslang.0 but wasn't happy with the slang0.99.38 or slang0.99.34 I have installed, and even made mention of the libc5 libraries and /usr/i486-linuxlibc1 during linking, although the final binary said it was linked with libc6. Most bizarre. hamish -- Hamish Moffatt, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5 CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
