On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 21:09:12 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 05:20:24PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > See: > > > > /usr/share/doc/libdpkg-perl/README.api > > > > $ dpkg -L libdpkg-perl|grep 'Hash\.pm'|xargs grep VERSION > > It seems my assumption is not that wrong: > > dpkg -L libparse-debcontrol-perl|grep 'DebControl\.pm'|xargs grep VERSION > use vars qw($VERSION); > $VERSION = '2.005'; > > So your conclusion from module version >= 1.00 to stability of API > remains unclear to me because both look somehow stable. As I have > written in my example test code: It does not really matter which one > we prefer - both are working perfectly fine. I'll leave the final > decision to the maintainer of uscan code who needs to accept the patch.
Oh, my comment was in response to gregor's doubts about his usage of the libdpkg-perl module, and my reply was intended to clarify just that, because there's modules in libdpkg-perl which are not public nor stable yet, for example. I don't know anything about the expectactions one should assume from libparse-debcontrol-perl (although I'd guess those are pretty similar given the versioning). thanks, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120821233108.ga22...@gaara.hadrons.org
