On 08/16/2012 11:42 PM, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:39:50PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > >> According to its PTS ( http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-ssh.html ): >> [2011-12-03] libpam-ssh REMOVED from testing (Britney) >> [2011-12-02] Removed 1.92-14 from unstable (Alexander Reichle-Schmehl) >> >> So I guess it must be considered as removed. >> > Yes, you are right. Sorry for my careless reading of that page. > > In any case, no ambiguity, it seems. I don't think a package's presence in > stable or oldstable alone is a problem. > On my side, I got fooled by reading too fast: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libpam-ssh&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all
The package is in SID, but only on few arch. Which makes me wonder: WHY ? How does such things happen? Is this because such ports aren't part of official Debian anymore? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/502d1aa1.1010...@goirand.fr
