Le vendredi 10 août 2012 à 11:56 +0200, Martin Wuertele a écrit : > That we do no longer have glibc in the archive and we had a transition > to eglibc was an understandable maintainer decision.
glibc/eglibc is not comparable to the other alternatives, the differences are extremely tiny. > How is core funcionality defined anyways? If network is considered a > core function and then we have net-tools and iprout, ifupdown, > network-manager, wicd, ethtool, mii-diag,.... and users do have a > choice. And this leads to poor user experience because none of these alternatives offers everything we expect from the networking system. > We do not yet have mdev in the archive but I hope that changes with the > next release. I can’t wait to see the brokenness it will bring. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1344597000.4958.13.camel@tomoyo
